Vlog

Initiate Proposal

QuickStart Summary

Note: Additional information and explanations are provided in the survey platform.  This document is meant to provide a high-level overview of the information requested to meet internal processing needs as well as regulatory and reporting requirements.

I. Proposal Information

  1. Enter names and email addresses for the PI (you) and all co-PIs.  In addition, list Senior or Key Personnel that will appear in the budget.  
  2. Proposal Type: select the type of proposal from the dropdown menu (new, renewal, pre-proposal, supplement, research needs statement, continuation, resubmission, revision, task order, other)
  3. Lead Unit:  The lead unit is the main unit responsible for project implementation/management and normally aligns with the PI departmental assignment.  
  4. Select a PI College-Level (or Division-Level) Affiliation.
  5. Activity Type: Select the primary and secondary (if appropriate) activities covered by this project from the list (research, instruction, public service, scholarships/fellowships, student services, institutional support, operations/maintenance, auxiliary enterprises).
  6. Research Type: Select the main type of research covered by this project (basic research, applied research, experimental development).  
  7. Select the disciplinary area that most closely aligns with the project.  The high-level categories (A-J) are as follows: Computer Science and Engineering (A&B), Geosciences, Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences (C), Life Sciences (D), Mathematics and Statistics (E), Physical Sciences (F), Psychology (G), Social Sciences (H), Other Sciences (I), Other Non‐Science, Non-Engineering Fields (J).  You will be asked to select the appropriate subcategory from a dropdown menu.
  8. Select any of the following research areas that align with your project (Empowering Communities, Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation, Coastal Resilience and Sustainability, Advanced Materials and Manufacturing, Holistic Fitness and Wellness).  If the research does not align with any of the specific areas, then select “Other Research Area”.
  9. Anticipated project start and end dates.
  10. Anticipated Project Title
  11. Select Funding Agency.  If agency not listed, select Other.
  12. What is the Solicitation or RFP number associated with the proposal submission?  
  13. If the Solicitation/RFP has multiple tracks/topics, please clarify exactly which topic and/or track you are planning for your application.  If this is not relevant, no response is needed.
  14. Provide the website address for the solicitation/RFP (if possible).
  15. Is there a set due date for proposal submission or is this an open call?
  16. Anticipated submission date or submission deadline date.

II. Institutional/Budgetary Information

Will the proposal involve any of the following items listed below? 

  • Cost sharing or matching funds
  • Subrecipient/Subaward, contractor/vendor and/or consultants
  • This project will be a subaward to a proposal at another institution.
  • Course buyout or course release for a faculty member
  • International travel
  • Requesting university-funded assistantship (committed to this specific project) or tuition waiver request for a graduate student 
  • Changes to or creation of a new course, academic program, degree and/or certification
  • Creation of new center and/or institute
  • Maintenance of facilities or equipment, additional space, modifications to existing space, or use of off-campus facilities not owned by the University – generating expenses specific to this project beyond normal F&A
  • Sponsor-directed obligation to continue the program beyond the term of the grant/contract
  • Program income

III. Export Control / Foreign Influence / Information Sharing / COI

General Questions:

  1. Within the past 5 years, have you (1) participated in any foreign talent recruitment programs or received any sort of benefit from such a program, (2) engaged in any services (paid or unpaid) for any foreign entity, military or government agency, or (3) held any appointments, titles, office or research space at any foreign educational or research institutions or any foreign entity, military or government agency?
  2. Will this proposal involve receipt or transfer of owned materials, or use of technology, a product, material or data owned or provided by a third party?
  3. Will you have a financial conflict of interest with respect to this proposal?  
  4. Will this proposal involve receipt or transmission of classified information or materials?

Additional Questions for STEM Researchers:

  1. Will your research project involve collaboration with anyone, including students, in a foreign country or who, if you are aware, is not a US citizen, asylum seeker or green cardholder?
  2. As part of your research project, do you plan to send materials or equipment to a foreign country?
  3. Will this proposal involve receipt or transmission of technical information to/from a foreign national or foreign country?
  4. Are you aware of any information or materials involved in your research which may be subject to export/import control requirements?
  5. Does your proposal involve a Federal contract or subcontract (e.g. Federal contracting officer or Federal contractor involved) or are you submitting to the NSF SBIR/STTR Program?
  6. Does your proposal qualify as fundamental research in that you will be generally free to publish the results of your research without having to get anyone’s approval, except perhaps for a brief review to remove any proprietary or patent information?
  7. You will also be asked to review the relevance of select research areas and agencies that are known to be more likely to have export control restrictions.

IV. Research Compliance 

Will the proposed research involve any of the following?

  • Humans as research subjects or human data use
  • Use of vertebrate animal subjects
  • Recombinant DNA or genetically modified plants or organisms
  • Biohazards or infectious material
  • Ionizing or non-ionizing radiation
  • Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)

Limited Submission

Limited Submission is a funding program for which the sponsor has restricted the number of applications or proposals an institution can submit in response to that program. 

The principal investigator is responsible for notifying Research Services as soon as possible if a proposal is being developed for any program that limits the number of submissions from the institution.

The submission of more proposals than allowed may result in a disqualification of all proposals, so limited submissions are coordinated through Research Services.  Generally, all campuses are considered a single institution by sponsors (e.g. NSF) unless alternate limitations (“by school,” “by department”) clearly apply.  However, some sponsors may consider branch campuses as separate, by definition.  It is best to consult early with your Grant Coordinator to make a determination.

Standard Limited Submission Procedure

It is critical that the PI review the  PRIOR to completing a limited submission packet for internal review.

Internal Limited Submission Competition Procedure

If it has been determined that institutional interest will exceed the sponsor cap, then the principal investigator should complete all Limited Submission Competition Materials (below) and submit the information to the Director of Research Services per the internally set deadline (at least 2 months prior to the sponsor deadline).  A cross-institutional committee (e.g. Research Associate Deans) will be convened by Research Services to determine which proposal(s) will be approved for submission to the sponsor; the committee will be chaired by a representative from the Office of Research (or a designee). All applicants will be informed by the Director of Research Services of the committee’s decision as expeditiously as possible and successful applicants should develop full proposals for submission utilizing normal procedures.

Previously authorized applicants are not automatically authorized to resubmit if an award was not secured from a past submission. Non-awarded PIs must go through the internal review and selection process as if it were a new submission. Within the 2-page preproposal outline, potential resubmissions should summarize reviewers’ concerns and how those concerns would be addressed in a resubmitted proposal.

Internal Limited Submission Competition Materials (Note page limitations)

Email materials to the Research Services Director as a single pdf document by the internal deadline.

  • Brief nomination Letter from Department Chair or equivalent – maximum 1 page
  • Brief pre-proposal outlining proposed research program – maximum 2 pages
  • NSF-formatted biosketch for the PI – maximum 2 pages
  • Resources/facilities statement, including any anticipated internal commitments (e.g. staff, facilities, cost share) – maximum 1 page
  • A copy of prior reviews in the case of a proposal resubmission

KickStart FAQs

Before the Survey

Review the Limited Submission guidelines and follow the instructions.  The outlined process will first assess interest and past awards and then institute an internal competition, if needed, before the PI can undertake proposal preparation with Research Services.  Be sure that you have been given permission to proceed with the full proposal before planning a submission.

If you have exercised due diligence in searching for limited submission language and do not find it, then assume that you can proceed. This language is generally found under eligibility and limitations sections. Your grant coordinator will also review the opportunity for submission limitations after you complete the KickStart survey.

Research Services is responsible for submitting all proposals for grants and contracts for research and other scholarly activities to public agencies (federal, state, or local government); private, nonprofit research organizations; and industries. The table below will help you determine if your funding may be a gift that would not involve Research Services.

CharacteristicsGiftsGrants/Contracts/Agreements
Applicability of Terms and ConditionsGiven without expectation of exchange of benefit; no quid pro quoSponsor defines terms such as confidentiality, publication, copyright, patent rights, liability, insurance, regulations, allowable costs, etc.
RestrictionsMinor/noneFunding is targeted for a specific objective
Scope of Work (SOW)Broad or general intentSpecific SOW defined by the sponsor and PI
DeliverablesNoMay include services, products, progress reports, milestones, technical or financial reports
Right to Audit ExpensesNoYes
Period of PerformanceNoDefined in award/agreement
Return of FundsNo, IrrevocableDefined in award/agreement
Subject to Indirect CostsNoYes

Research Services is responsible for submitting all proposals for grants and contracts for research and other scholarly activities to public agencies (federal, state, or local government); private, nonprofit research organizations; and industries. Research Services is responsible for ensuring compliance with all university, state, and federal regulations surrounding sponsored grants and contracts as per university policy .

Research Services assists investigators in preparing and submitting all proposals. All proposals submitted on behalf of faculty, administrators, staff or students must be processed through Research Services;  principal investigators (PIs) or program directors (PDs) may not apply for or receive funding directly from sponsors without university approval except for those fellowships awarded directly to individuals.

Yes, projects are allowed to use crowdfunding.  And, yes, these types of projects generally must go through Research Services.

By definition, crowdfunding or crowd-sourcing describes the practice of funding a project or venture by raising many small donations of money from a large number of people. It can be used to fundraise for a wide variety of projects initiated by faculty, staff, students, and groups on campus at Vlog.

The university has selected  for funding research and other projects in the sciences and has developed procedures to guide projects seeking to use research funds raised through crowdfunding mechanisms.

The use of crowdfunding or crowd-sourcing as described and the accompanying procedures is subject to all University rules, policies, compliance regulations, and state and federal law and applies to all employees, affiliate staff, students and other individuals. The purpose is to regulate and track the level of campus crowdfunding and to assess the impact of such activity at the University.

During the Survey

Yes. Once you have a solid idea of your project, team (or most of your team) and funding source, then you should complete the KickStart survey to get the process moving forward. You can always make revisions if your plans change, but it is very important to start this process early to ensure enough time for completion of budgetary and regulatory requirements. The goal is to quickly move you through internal approval so that you have significant dedicated time to focus on your project description before the submission deadline. If you are still unsure, contact your grant coordinator for guidance.

Yes. The grant coordinator will use your initial information to provide you with guidance, but if something changes then you should immediately notify your grant coordinator. If there are numerous changes, then the grant coordinator may ask you to resubmit the survey to ensure accurate records. Note: the survey is uploaded to your proposal file.

You should complete the survey is early as possible. Once you have a solid idea of your project, team (or most of your team) and funding source, then you should complete the KickStart survey to get the process moving forward. You can always make revisions if your plans change, but it is very important to start this process early to ensure enough time for completion of budgetary and regulatory requirements. The goal is to quickly move you through internal approval so that you have significant dedicated time to focus on your project description before the submission deadline. If you are still unsure, contact your grant coordinator for guidance.

Yes. You can enter and exit the survey to view without triggering a response. However, many fields are required so you will be prompted to enter information to proceed. No information is sent to Research Services unless you “Submit” a survey.

Yes.  You can enter and exit the survey as needed and your responses will be saved until you “Submit” the survey.

After the Survey

When you submit the KickStart survey, you will automatically be emailed a copy of your input. This can sometimes take 1-2 hours, as the system often batches tasks. If you do not receive the information, please check your SPAM folder. Your grant coordinator will also have a copy of this information.

No, it is not necessary for you to initiate a proposal. After the grant coordinator receives the information, he/she will initiate your proposal in CloudExpress and contact you with proposal ID information.

Grant coordinators will be planning to initiate a proposal for you after receiving your KickStart information. If you decide that you want to initiate the proposal yourself, please contact your grant coordinator before completing the survey to prevent duplication of effort.

Research Services and Research Integrity will continue to use the CloudExpress system for proposal, compliance and award management, but PIs will not be asked to directly navigate in the system at this time.   Instead, you will receive direct links for activities that are completed within the system (e.g. certification, approvals, training). 

Proposal preparation time can vary widely, from a few weeks to a year (for very complex projects). You should assess both your preparation timeline and additional items that may be beyond your control (e.g. budget information from another institution, letters of collaboration, co-PI certifications/training, legal issues). In general, the more complex the project, the more time it takes. However, a minimum timeline is generally 2 months. If you find yourself on a compressed timeline (e.g. funding opportunity announced less than 2 months from submission deadline), then alert your grant coordinator immediately so that the office can work to accommodate your request.

The timeline from submission to award notification (and award start) can vary dramatically, depending upon the granting agency. It is not unusual for federal programs to have an 8-12 month lag between submission and project start dates (if awarded). Some agencies and foundations include timing estimates in their calls for funding. You should set a reasonable start date that aligns with your project goals, knowing that the agency may ask for a date modification.